Navigation and service

Use of cookies

By clicking on "Allow" you consent to the anonymous recording of your stay on the site. The evaluations do not contain any personal data and are used exclusively for the analysis, maintenance and improvement of our website. For further information on data privacy, please click on the following link: Data Privacy Policy

OK

Connection between regional deprivation and individual socioeconomic status with the prevalence of Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Germany

Second funding phase of the "Health-related Competence Network Diabetes Mellitus" (KKnDm)

Contact: Dr. Christa Scheidt-Nave, Dr. Christin Heidemann

The project aims to provide population-related data on the impact of regional deprivation independent of individual social factors on adults in Germany. The evaluation is based on pooled data of two national health surveys of the Robert Koch Institute (GEDA09; GEDA10) conducted on the telephone within a short period of time using the newly developed "German Index of Multiple Deprivation" (GIMD).

Duration / status: 2012 – 2013

Data sources: GEDA09, GEDA10

Project type: Research project

Commissioned / financed by: Funded by Federal Ministry of Education and Research

Cooperation partners: KKnDm, Helmholtz Centre Munich, German Research Centre for Environmental Health (HMGU), Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management

Date: 12.11.2018

Publications

  • Schipf S, Werner A, Tamayo T, Holle R, Schunk M, Maier W, Meisinger C, Thorand B, Berger K, Mueller G, Moebus S, Bokhof B, Kluttig A, Greiser KH, Neuhauser H, Ellert U et al. (2012): Regional differences in the prevalence of known type 2 diabetes mellitus in 45–74 years old individuals: Results from six population-based studies in Germany (DIAB-CORE Consortium)
    Diabet. Med. 29 (7): e88-e95. Epub Jan 16. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03578.x. more

  • Kroll LE, Lampert T (2012): Regionalisierung von Gesundheitsindikatoren: Ergebnisse aus der GEDA-Studie 2009. [Regionalization of health indicators: Results from the GEDA-Study 2009].
    Bundesgesundheitsbl 55 (1): 129–140. doi: 10.1007/s00103-011-1403-1. more